- Published on
Operators on Infinite Dimensional Vector Spaces 7
- Authors
- Name
- Malachy Reynolds
- @MalachyReynolds
Boundedness Tests and Further Examples
Here we prove two important sufficient conditions for boundedness of integral operators: The Schur test and the Hilbert-Schmidt test. Using these conditions, we discuss boundedness of some concrete classes of operators.
Integral Operators
Definition 3.1: Let be a measure space, and be a measureable function. Then, the formula:
formally defines a linear operator. Operators of this type are called integral operators and is called the integral kernel of .
Discussion:
The reason why we state that the formula above defines formally a linear operator is that we haven't defined its domain or codomain, which can depend on the integral kernel . To say that the operator is linear in such a case should be understood in the sense that "if and are such that and are well-defined, then for all , is also well-defined and is equal to ".
The aim of this section is to give conditions on the integral kernel so that we can identify the domain and codomain on which is well-defined as a bounded operator. In examples the measure space will often be either or with the counting measure; or with the Lebesgue measure. In applications, it can be a good idea to translate the definition of some operator into one where it looks like an integral operator for an appropriate measure space .
Schur's Test
Theorem 3.2: Let be a measure space, be a measurable function such that:
Then , where is the integral operator with integral kernel . Furthermore, it satisfies Schur's bound:
Remark: As usual, the use of the essential supremum in 3.2 is due to the measure-theoretic nature of the definition. One often computes these quantities as a supremum, when is a nice enough function.
Proof:
Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have that:
Squaring this inequality and integrating with respect to the variable we obtain that:
where changing the integral order in the equality is justified from 3.2 and using Hölder's inequality with exponents in the last line.
Let us now see a few examples where Schur's test allows us to prove that an operator is bounded.
Example 3.3: Let be an "infinite matrix" of complex numbers. Then if we take and be the counting measure, we can define an operator with integral kernel as:
If:
then Schur's test tells us that and:
Note: with the counting measure.
Example 3.4: Let . Consider the operator on defined by the "matrix" (A matrix of this type is called a Hankel matrix). By the Schur test, the condition ensures the boundedness of this operator.
Example 3.5: Let be a bounded domain, let , and let . Define as the integral operator given by:
Then Schur's test tells us that is bounded whenever . Operators of this form appear naturally in many problems in analysis. They are called integral operators with weak singularity. For operators of this type are, in general, no longer bounded. However one has: Example 3.6: Let be defined by:
where:
Then is bounded; this is a very non-trivial statement which we will not prove in this course. It is proven using Fourier analysis. is the Hilbert transform. In fact, it is not only bounded but unitary (i.e. ).
Example 3.7: Let . Consider the operator given by:
is called the convolution of and . Operators of this type are called the convolution operators. In this case, Schur's test applies and is bounded with:
Remark 3.8: There is a little subtlety in defining some of the above operators. It can be illustrated for the convolution operator. Let ; then a priori it is not clear why the integral above would exist for any at all. One should define on some dense set for example , and then use the Schur bound to prove that there exists an extension of to the whole of .