Published on

Operators on Infinite Dimensional Vector Spaces 7

Authors

Boundedness Tests and Further Examples

Here we prove two important sufficient conditions for boundedness of integral operators: The Schur test and the Hilbert-Schmidt test. Using these conditions, we discuss boundedness of some concrete classes of operators.

Integral Operators

Definition 3.1: Let (Ω,μ)(\Omega, \mu) be a measure space, and k:Ω×ΩCk : \Omega \times \Omega \rightarrow \mathbb{C} be a measureable function. Then, the formula:

[Kf](x)Ωk(x,y)f(y)dμ(y)[Kf](x) \coloneqq \int_{\Omega} k(x,y)f(y)d \mu(y)

formally defines a linear operator. Operators of this type are called integral operators and kk is called the integral kernel of KK.

Discussion:

The reason why we state that the formula above defines formally a linear operator is that we haven't defined its domain or codomain, which can depend on the integral kernel kk. To say that the operator is linear in such a case should be understood in the sense that "if ff and gg are such that KfKf and KgKg are well-defined, then for all αC\alpha \in \mathbb{C}, K(αf+g)K(\alpha f + g) is also well-defined and is equal to αKf+Kg\alpha Kf + Kg".

The aim of this section is to give conditions on the integral kernel kk so that we can identify the domain and codomain on which KK is well-defined as a bounded operator. In examples the measure space (Ω,μ)(\Omega,\mu) will often be either N\mathbb{N} or Z\mathbb{Z} with the counting measure; or Rd\mathbb{R}^d with the Lebesgue measure. In applications, it can be a good idea to translate the definition of some operator into one where it looks like an integral operator for an appropriate measure space (Ω,μ)(\Omega,\mu).

Schur's Test

Theorem 3.2: Let (Ω,μ)(\Omega, \mu) be a measure space, k:Ω×ΩCk: \Omega \times \Omega \rightarrow \mathbb{C} be a measurable function such that:

m1ess supxΩΩk(x,y)dμ(y)<,m2ess supyΩΩk(x,y)dμ(x)<.m_1 \coloneqq \text{ess } \sup_{x \in \Omega} \int_{\Omega} |k(x,y)|d \mu(y) < \infty, \\ m_2 \coloneqq \text{ess } \sup_{y \in \Omega} \int_{\Omega} |k(x,y)|d \mu(x) < \infty.

Then KB(L2(Ω))K \in \mathcal{B}(L^2(\Omega)), where KK is the integral operator with integral kernel kk. Furthermore, it satisfies Schur's bound:

Km112m212.\|K\| \leq m_1^{\frac{1}{2}}m_2^{\frac{1}{2}}.

Remark: As usual, the use of the essential supremum in 3.2 is due to the measure-theoretic nature of the definition. One often computes these quantities as a supremum, when kk is a nice enough function.

Proof:

Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have that:

[Kf](x)Ωk(x,y)f(y)dμ(y)(Ωk(x,y)dμ(y))12(Ωk(x,y)f(y)2dμ(y))12m112(Ωk(x,y)f(y)2dμ(y))12.|[Kf](x)| \leq \int_{\Omega} |k(x,y)||f(y)|d \mu(y) \\ \leq \left(\int_{\Omega} |k(x,y)|d \mu(y) \right)^{\frac{1}{2}} \left(\int_{\Omega}|k(x,y)||f(y)|^2 d\mu(y)\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} \\ \leq m_1^{\frac{1}{2}} \left(\int_{\Omega} |k(x,y)| |f(y)|^2 d \mu(y) \right)^{\frac{1}{2}} .

Squaring this inequality and integrating with respect to the xx variable we obtain that:

Kf22m1ΩΩk(x,y)f(y)2dμ(y)dμ(x)=Ωf(y)2Ωk(x,y)dμ(x)dμ(y)m1m2f22;\|Kf\|_2^2 \leq m_1 \int_{\Omega} \int_{\Omega} |k(x,y)| |f(y)|^2 d\mu(y) d\mu(x) \\ = \int_{\Omega} |f(y)|^2 \int_{\Omega} |k(x,y)| d\mu(x) d\mu(y) \\ \leq m_1 m_2 \|f\|_2^2;

where changing the integral order in the equality is justified from 3.2 and using Hölder's inequality with exponents (1,)(1,\infty) in the last line. \blacksquare

Let us now see a few examples where Schur's test allows us to prove that an operator is bounded.

Example 3.3: Let {kij:i,jN}\{k_{ij} : i,j \in \mathbb{N}\} be an "infinite matrix" of complex numbers. Then if we take Ω=N\Omega = \mathbb{N} and μ\mu be the counting measure, we can define an operator with integral kernel kk as:

[Kx]i=jkijxj.[Kx]_i = \sum_j k_{ij}x_j.

If:

m1=supijkij< and m2=supjikij<,m_1 = \sup_i \sum_j |k_{ij}| < \infty \ \text{and} \ m_2 = \sup_j \sum_i |k_{ij}| < \infty,

then Schur's test tells us that K:22K: \ell^2 \rightarrow \ell^2 and:

Km112m212.\|K\| \leq m_1^{\frac{1}{2}}m_2^{\frac{1}{2}}.

Note: 2=L2(N)\ell^2 = L^2(\mathbb{N}) with the counting measure.

Example 3.4: Let t1t \in \ell^1. Consider the operator on 2\ell^2 defined by the "matrix" {ti+j}i,j=0\{t_{i+j}\}_{i,j=0}^{\infty} (A matrix of this type is called a Hankel matrix). By the Schur test, the condition t1t \in \ell^1 ensures the boundedness of this operator.

Example 3.5: Let ΩRd\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^d be a bounded domain, let α>0\alpha > 0, and let k0L(Ω×Ω)k_0 \in L^{\infty}(\Omega \times \Omega). Define Kα:L2(Ω)L2(Ω)K_{\alpha}: L^2(\Omega) \rightarrow L^2(\Omega) as the integral operator given by:

[Kf](x)=Ωk0(x,y)xyαf(y)dy.[Kf](x) = \int_{\Omega} \frac{k_0(x,y)}{|x-y|^{\alpha}}f(y) dy.

Then Schur's test tells us that KαK_{\alpha} is bounded whenever α(0,d)\alpha \in (0,d). Operators of this form appear naturally in many problems in analysis. They are called integral operators with weak singularity. For α=d\alpha = d operators of this type are, in general, no longer bounded. However one has: Example 3.6: Let HL2(R)H \in L^2(\mathbb{R}) be defined by:

(Hf)(x)=1πi p.v.Rf(y)xydy.(Hf)(x) = \frac{1}{\pi i} \ \text{p.v.} \int_{\mathbb{R}} \frac{f(y)}{x-y} dy.

where:

p.v. Rf(y)xydy=limε0R[ε,ε]f(y)xydy\text{p.v. } \int_{\mathbb{R}}\frac{f(y)}{x-y} dy = \lim_{\varepsilon \rightarrow 0}\int{\mathbb{R} - [-\varepsilon,\varepsilon]} \frac{f(y)}{x-y} dy

Then HH is bounded; this is a very non-trivial statement which we will not prove in this course. It is proven using Fourier analysis. HH is the Hilbert transform. In fact, it is not only bounded but unitary (i.e. Hf=f\|Hf\| = \|f\|).

Example 3.7: Let rL1(Rd)r \in L^1(\mathbb{R}^d). Consider the operator TL2(Rd)T \in L^2(\mathbb{R}^d) given by:

[fr](x)[Rf](x)=Rdr(xy)f(y)dy.[f \star r](x) \coloneqq [Rf](x) = \int_{\mathbb{R}^d} r(x-y)f(y)dy.

TfTf is called the convolution of rr and ff. Operators of this type are called the convolution operators. In this case, Schur's test applies and RR is bounded with:

Rr1.\|R\| \leq \|r\|_1.

Remark 3.8: There is a little subtlety in defining some of the above operators. It can be illustrated for the convolution operator. Let fL2(Rd)f \in L^2(\mathbb{R}^d); then a priori it is not clear why the integral above would exist for any xx at all. One should define TT on some dense set DD for example D=L2(Rd)L(Rd)D=L^2(\mathbb{R}^d) \cap L^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^d), and then use the Schur bound to prove that there exists an extension of TT to the whole of L2(R2)L^2(\mathbb{R}^2).